JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 20, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Sala Plena

✓
Topic · hard data
Proyecto De Ley 47 De 2002 Senado Y 57 De 2002 Camara. Referendo. Control Automatico. Cosa Juzgada. Devolucion Para Continuar Tramite
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Referendo
  • Etapas de desarrollo de convocatoria
  • Ley de convocatoria no es estatutaria
  • Devolución al Congreso para sanción y promulgación
Control De Constitucionalidad De Ley De Referendo
  • Carácter automático y cosa juzgada
  • Carácter posterior a sanción y promulgación de ley
  • Carácter reforzado
2 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se devolvió el Proyecto de Ley No. 47 de 2002 Senado - 57 de 2002 Cámara, al Presidente del Senado, para que continúe su trámite.

Una vez sancionada y promulgada la ley, deberá ser enviada a esta Corte para que ejerza el correspondiente control constitucional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Devolver el proyecto de ley No. 47 de 2002 Senado - 57 de 2002 Camara, al Presidente del Senado, para que continue su tramite.
  2. Segundo. Una vez sancionada y promulgada la ley, debera ser enviada a esta Corte para que ejerza el correspondiente control constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.